You are browsing the archive for Lobbyists Archives - Rogue Media.

Why We Occupy

February 7, 2012 in Finance, Headline, Occupy, Politics, Update, Video Perspective

by Kristian Gore

Occupy Jacksonville (Photo by Clinton Eastman)

Part of an interview here at Occupy Jacksonville I gave that starts to scratch the surface of what we are doing here. Most of the press refuses to understand that this is about the money and of course our local officials are intentionally obtuse about why we are here.

So why are we here? We are here to change our government and try to change the system of legal bribery we currently have. It’s true we all have other issues that we are passionate about but this is the reason we are here. The difference we want to make is about making it possible for people to run for office without having to collect the most bribes or be the most bought guy standing.

Why protest Wall Street when the government is the problem? Our elected officials are mere employees of multinational corporations now, so we can pressure them all they want but it won’t do any good. They do as they are told and the lobbyists act like middle management. Lobbying groups and think tanks do all the leg work and collect a lot of the bribe moneyto fund the campaigns. They makethepromisestoinsure they have a high paying job when they leave office.

When we vote out a politician it only means he gets a promotion and if they collect enough bribes maybe they can run one of the multinational corporations that run the lobbyists and own our politicians. Our elected officials have become whores ready to do the bidding of the highest bidder.

So again why Wall Street and not the corporations themselves? Two reasons in my opinion. The first is simple, all these corporations are traded on Wall Street. The second has to do with the sheer greed that led to the collapse of our economy. These people don’t do anything but make money. They don’t produce anything and if they make money the big Wall Street brokers get a cut and when they tank a 401k they still make money. They drive up prices on goods and services without ever doing anything real. I can’t think of a better symbol of the owners of our government.

So why do people still buy things from these companies? First answer is that we have nothing against people making a buck by producing a product. There is nothing wrong with producing a product that people want. What I object to is them buying our elected officials in exchange for loopholes that make it possible for a hugely profitable company to pay no taxes and still get a big subsidy. Elected officials say the poor are a drain because they pay little in taxes and get money for food and other essentials and yet they quickly rush to give billions to companies that make billions already and pay no taxes. Bribes are cheaper than taxes.  [see video below] Read the rest of this entry →

Say NO to ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement)

January 24, 2012 in Headline, Politics, Video Perspective, World News

What is ACTA?

text for article from Electronic Frontier Foundation -  https://www.eff.org/issues/acta

In October 2007, the United States, the European Community, Switzerland, and Japan simultaneously announced that they would negotiate a new intellectual property enforcement treaty the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement or ACTA. Australia, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Mexico, Jordan, Morocco, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Canada have joined the negotiations. Although the proposed treaty’s title might suggest that the agreement deals only with counterfeit physical goods (such as medicines) what little information has been made available publicly by negotiating governments about the content of the treaty makes it clear that it will have a far broader scope and in particular will deal with new tools targeting “Internet distribution and information technology”.

In recent years major U.S. and EU copyright industry rightsholder groups have sought stronger powers to enforce their intellectual property rights across the world to preserve their business models. These efforts have been underway in a number of international fora including at the World Trade Organization the World Customs Organization at the G8 summit at the World Intellectual Property Organization’s Advisory Committee on Enforcement and at the Intellectual Property Experts’ Group at the Asia Pacific Economic Coalition. Since the conclusion of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Issues of Intellectual Property in 1994 (TRIPS) most new intellectual property enforcement powers have been created outside of the traditional multilateral venues through bilateral and regional free trade agreements entered into by the United States and the European Community with their respective key trading partners. ACTA is the new frontline in the global IP enforcement agenda.

Read the rest of this entry →

Lobbying Firm Prepares $850,000 Assault On Movement

December 1, 2011 in Finance, Headline, Occupy, Politics

A report was recently leaked from the lobbying firm Clark, Lytle, Geduldig, Cranfordintendedforoneofit’s WallStreet clients. They warn of the dangers of the Occupy Wall Street movement, and advise engaging in a public relations campaign to discredit the movement. They are demanding a price of $850,000 to engage in the misinformation campaign. This campaign will include researching activists’ financial histories and civil and criminal information, and monitoring social media. The first two paragraphs of the memo read: “Leading Democratic party strategists have begun to openly discuss the benefits of embracing the growing and increasingly organized Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement to prevent Republican gains in Congress and the White House next year. We have seen this process of adopting extreme positions and movements to increase base voter turnout, including in the 2005-2006 immigration debate. This would mean more than just short-term discomfort for Wall Street firms. If vilifying the leading companies of this sector is allowed to become an unchallenged centerpiece of a coordinated Democratic campaign, it has the potential to have very long-lasting political, policy and financial impacts on the companies in the center of the bullseye. It shouldn’t be surprising that the Democratic party or even President Obama’s re-election team would campaign againstWallStreetinthiscycle. Howeverthebiggerconcernshouldbethat Republicans will no longer defend Wall Street companies—and might start running against them too.”